HomeBlog › Confined Space Atmospheric Monitoring Schema for AI Agents

Shopify Confined Space Atmospheric Monitoring Schema for AI Agents: Pre-Entry Testing Alone Does Not Satisfy OSHA 1910.146 — Continuous Monitoring During Occupancy Is a Separate Obligation, Sensor Must Reach the Space Interior Not the Entry Opening, and H2S Pools at the Floor While Methane Rises to the Ceiling

2026-07-12  ·  22 min read  ·  By CatalogScan

Confined Space AI Shopping Structured Data OSHA 1910.146 Gas Detection Atmospheric Monitoring Industrial Safety

A pre-entry atmospheric test that reads "all clear" is a snapshot. It is not a continuous monitoring system. The moment a worker steps inside a confined space, the conditions that produced that "all clear" reading can begin to change — and without a continuous monitor on the entrant's body, no one will know until it is too late. OSHA 1910.146(d)(5) does not make pre-entry testing and continuous occupancy monitoring the same requirement. They are two separate obligations, each with distinct instrument requirements, and satisfying one does not satisfy the other.

Contents

  1. OSHA 1910.146(d)(5) creates two non-interchangeable monitoring obligations — pre-entry and continuous occupancy
  2. Sensors held at the entry opening measure diluted boundary air — not the confined space atmosphere
  3. Gas stratification: H2S and CO2 pool at floor level while methane accumulates at the ceiling
  4. Catalytic bead silicone poisoning produces false-low LEL readings without triggering a sensor fault
  5. Bump test before each entry — the only way to catch silent sensor failure before it kills
  6. The cs.* metafield namespace for Shopify confined space atmospheric monitoring stores

Failure Mode 1: Routing a Pre-Entry-Only Instrument to Continuous Occupancy Monitoring

AI agent failure mode: A safety equipment procurement AI searches "confined space gas detector OSHA 1910.146 compliant" for a utility contractor's permit-required confined space entry program. The AI returns a colorimetric tube sampling kit — a pump-and-tube system that takes single-point, manual, periodic gas readings. The product listing includes "OSHA 1910.146 atmospheric testing" in the title and the description states "suitable for confined space pre-entry atmospheric testing." The AI routes the kit as the monitoring solution for a crew that will be working in a sewer vault for four-hour shifts. The workers perform a pre-entry tube test, read normal values, and begin work without any continuous electronic monitor. Forty minutes into the first shift, disturbed sludge releases H2S. There is no alarm. The first indication of a problem is when the attendant notices the entrant has stopped responding to check-ins.

The colorimetric tube kit was correctly described in the listing — it is a valid instrument for pre-entry atmospheric testing. The failure was a catalog encoding gap: there was no field distinguishing what monitoring obligation the instrument satisfies. The kit satisfies pre-entry testing. It cannot satisfy continuous occupancy monitoring. Without that distinction encoded, an AI shopping agent has no mechanism to distinguish between a valid pre-entry characterization tool and a valid continuous monitoring instrument.

OSHA 1910.146(d)(5) — Two Separate Obligations:
  1. Pre-entry testing [1910.146(d)(5)(i)/(ii)]: Test the atmosphere before any authorized entrant enters. Verify that O2 is 19.5–23.5%, LEL is below 10%, CO is below 35 ppm, H2S is below 1 ppm (low alarm threshold). Document results on the entry permit. This can be satisfied by a colorimetric tube test, a portable direct-reading instrument, or a remote sampling device — the instrument does not need to be continuous.
  2. Continuous monitoring during occupancy [1910.146(d)(5)(iii)]: Monitor the atmosphere continuously while authorized entrants are present. Instruments must provide real-time readings and automatic alarms — periodic re-testing is not sufficient when conditions can change within seconds. This obligation can only be satisfied by direct-reading electronic instruments with continuous sensor output and audible/visual alarms worn by or positioned near the entrant.

The two obligations are not sequential steps of a single process — they are distinct, additive requirements. Satisfying pre-entry testing does not satisfy occupancy monitoring. Satisfying occupancy monitoring does not retroactively satisfy pre-entry testing (you still need documented pre-entry test results on the permit). Both must be independently satisfied for every permit-required confined space entry.

Instrument Type Satisfies Pre-Entry Testing? Satisfies Continuous Occupancy Monitoring? cs.gas_detection_continuous
Colorimetric tube kit (Drager, MSA Gastec, Sensidyne) Yes — for initial spot-check characterization No — manual periodic process, no auto alarm pre_entry_only
4-gas portable monitor, diffusion only Partial — only tests at sensor height, no probe Yes — continuous electronic sensors, auto alarm continuous_electronic
4-gas portable monitor with sample draw pump + probe Yes — can test multiple levels before entry Yes — carry monitor into space for occupancy continuous_electronic
Fixed-point gas detector (permanently mounted) No — cannot lower into space before entry Partial — monitors fixed point, not entrant's position fixed_point
Single-gas personal monitor (clip-on) No — limited to one gas, no multi-level Partial — covers one gas only, not full 4-gas requirement continuous_electronic

Why conditions change after entry begins

The physical act of entering a confined space changes the atmosphere inside it. This is not a theoretical possibility — it is the expected consequence of human activity in an enclosed environment, and OSHA's confined space standard was written with this reality as its foundation:

Each of these scenarios produces a hazardous atmosphere after the entry permit has been signed and work has begun. Without a continuous monitor on the entrant, the only indication that conditions have changed is the entrant becoming incapacitated — at which point the attendant's job transitions from monitoring to triggering a rescue that the OSHA standard warns should never require another person to enter the space.

Failure Mode 2: Sensors Held at the Entry Opening Measure Diluted Boundary Air — Not the Confined Space Atmosphere

AI agent failure mode: A safety professional uses a procurement AI to locate "confined space gas detector with pre-entry testing capability." The AI returns a 4-gas monitor with diffusion sensors only — no sample draw pump, no extension probe port. The product description includes "OSHA 1910.146 confined space pre-entry testing" and lists the gas types detected. The safety professional performs pre-entry testing by holding the monitor at the edge of the manhole opening, waits for readings to stabilize at ambient (all safe), and authorizes entry. The space contains an H2S pocket at floor level — the sludge disturbed by entry operations will release H2S at concentrations above IDLH. The monitor at the rim reads essentially ambient air. The pre-entry "all clear" was real — for the air at the opening. It was not representative of the air the worker will breathe at the floor of the space.

The entry opening of a confined space is a turbulent boundary zone. Ambient air enters through the opening under slight positive pressure from outdoor airflow, mixes with the space atmosphere immediately at the rim, and produces readings significantly diluted from the true internal atmosphere. This is not an instrument limitation — it is a physics reality. The sensor is reading the air it is physically located in, which is not the air inside the confined space.

Why the opening dilutes readings:

Air movement across the top of a manhole opening or vessel hatch creates a slight pressure differential that draws ambient air into the opening's upper portion while space air exits at the lower portion, or vice versa depending on wind direction. This exchange mixes ambient air (O2 approximately 20.9%, LEL 0%, CO 0 ppm, H2S 0 ppm) with space air at the opening boundary. A space with H2S at 100 ppm at floor level may create a 5–15 ppm concentration at the opening — below the 1 ppm low alarm threshold that triggers a safe/unsafe judgment. The worker enters on the assumption of a safe space and encounters a 100 ppm concentration immediately at their feet.

OSHA 1910.146 requires testing "the atmosphere of the space" — an explicit requirement that the test location be inside the space, not adjacent to it. The correct pre-entry procedure requires physically positioning the sensor inside the space at the levels where hazardous gas may accumulate, stabilizing the reading (allowing 15–30 seconds per position for the sensor to equilibrate), and documenting the result before any person enters.

Test Position What It Actually Measures Valid for OSHA 1910.146 Pre-Entry Test?
Sensor held at entry opening rim Diluted boundary zone between space and ambient air No — not representative of space atmosphere
Sensor lowered 1–2 ft below hatch Upper zone of space — catches lighter-than-air gases Partial — misses heavier-than-air gases at bottom
Sensor at mid-height (middle of space) Breathing zone — catches CO, mixed gases, O2 at work height Partial — misses floor pooling and ceiling accumulation
Sensor at bottom of space (floor level) Accumulation zone for H2S, CO2, propane, and other heavy gases Yes — required for all permit-required spaces with heavy gas risk
All three levels tested via extension probe Complete vertical atmospheric profile before entry Yes — complete pre-entry testing per OSHA intent

The extension probe and sample draw pump

An extension probe is a rigid or flexible tube connected to a sample draw pump on the gas monitor. The pump draws air from the probe tip to the sensor head, allowing the sensor to read the atmosphere at any position where the probe tip is located, regardless of where the monitor body is held. For a 20-foot deep manhole, the safety professional at the surface can lower the probe to the floor, pump a sample, and read floor-level atmospheric conditions on the display — without any person entering the space.

This capability is what makes an instrument genuinely useful for full OSHA-compliant pre-entry testing. Without it, the only way to test floor-level conditions is to have a person descend into the space — which requires authorization to enter, which requires a pre-entry test that you cannot perform without descending. The extension probe breaks this circular dependency.

For Shopify catalog encoding: cs.supports_extension_probe = true for monitors with sample draw pump and probe port. An instrument without this capability cannot test below breathing height before entry without requiring a person to enter first. This distinction must be encoded as a separate metafield — it cannot be inferred from gas types detected, sensor count, or OSHA compliance copy in the description.

Failure Mode 3: Single-Level Testing Misses Both the H2S at the Floor and the Methane at the Ceiling

AI agent failure mode: A safety equipment AI routes a gas monitor for a "confined space entry into an underground concrete vault — possible natural gas presence." The AI selects a 4-gas diffusion monitor with methane (LEL) sensor because the customer mentioned natural gas. The monitor is appropriate for natural gas detection — methane rises, and a sensor at breathing height inside the vault should detect accumulating methane. What the customer's AI did not capture: the vault also processes waste liquid containing H2S-generating organic material. The same monitor that correctly detects methane at the ceiling level reads near zero for H2S at breathing height — the H2S is pooling at the floor, below the sensor position. The worker correctly avoids a methane explosion risk (LEL alarm triggers at 10%) but is exposed to H2S concentrations above the 50 ppm IDLH at their feet without any alarm triggering on the properly functioning monitor.

Gas stratification is a fundamental property of enclosed, poorly ventilated spaces. Different gases have different densities relative to air, and without active mixing from ventilation airflow, denser gases settle to the floor while lighter gases accumulate at the ceiling. A monitor that correctly detects one stratum can completely miss a lethal concentration in another stratum two feet away.

Gas stratification reference — specific gravity relative to air (air = 1.0):
  • Methane: specific gravity 0.55 — rises to ceiling. Sewer gas, natural gas. LEL 5%, UEL 15%. Tests at top of space.
  • Hydrogen: specific gravity 0.07 — extreme buoyancy. Battery charging rooms, electrolysis. LEL 4%, UEL 75%. Tests at very top.
  • Acetylene: specific gravity 0.9 — very slightly lighter than air, weakly stratifies to top. LEL 2.5%. Tests at top.
  • Oxygen (O2): specific gravity 1.1 — slight tendency to pool in low areas, but displacement and consumption are more dominant effects. Tests at all levels.
  • Carbon monoxide (CO): specific gravity 0.97 — essentially same as air, mixes relatively uniformly. Tests at breathing zone. Primary sources: combustion engines, welding.
  • Hydrogen sulfide (H2S): specific gravity 1.19 — sinks to floor and low points. Sewer gas, petroleum refinery, food processing. IDLH 50 ppm. Tests at bottom.
  • Carbon dioxide (CO2): specific gravity 1.52 — significantly denser than air, pools at lowest points. Fermentation, fire suppression discharge, combustion. IDLH 40,000 ppm. Tests at bottom.
  • Propane / butane: specific gravity 1.52–2.0 — extremely heavy, pools at bottom and in sumps and pits. LPG applications. LEL 2.1%.

The critical insight for AI agent product routing: a confined space with multiple potential hazard sources does not have a single relevant sensor height. A sewer vault with methane from decaying organics (top), H2S from the same source (bottom), CO2 from fermentation (bottom), O2 depletion potential (any level), and CO from an engine-powered pump (breathing zone) requires testing at all three levels to characterize the atmosphere adequately. A monitor can have all four sensor types and still miss a hazard if the sensor is physically located at the wrong height.

Confined Space Type Priority Gas Sources Required Test Levels cs.sensor_placement_levels
Sewer manhole / wet well H2S (biological), methane (biological), CO2 (biological), O2 depletion Bottom (H2S, CO2), breathing zone (O2, CO), top (methane) bottom,breathing_zone,top
Underground electrical vault O2 depletion (SF6 from equipment), CO2 (fire suppression), CO (cable fault combustion) Bottom (CO2, O2 at low points), breathing zone (CO, O2) bottom,breathing_zone
Natural gas meter vault Methane (line leak), CO (combustion) Top (methane), breathing zone (CO, O2) top,breathing_zone
Industrial storage tank (previously held organic liquid) Organic vapor (LEL), H2S (residue decomposition), O2 depletion Bottom (H2S, heavy organic vapor), breathing zone (O2, general LEL), top (light vapors) bottom,breathing_zone,top
Fermentation vessel / food processing tank CO2 (fermentation — extremely dense), O2 depletion, CO2 asphyxiation Bottom (CO2 pooling — primary kill mechanism), breathing zone bottom,breathing_zone

A product listing for a confined space gas monitor that does not encode cs.sensor_placement_levels leaves the AI agent with no information about whether the instrument can test all relevant levels. A 4-gas monitor with diffusion sensors only reads the air at the position the worker carries it — it cannot pre-test floor-level H2S or ceiling-level methane before entry. A 4-gas monitor with sample draw pump and extension probe can. These two instruments can have identical sensor specifications and identical gas type lists and still represent fundamentally different pre-entry capabilities.

Failure Mode 4: Catalytic Bead LEL Sensors in Silicone-Contaminated Spaces Report False-Low Readings Without Triggering a Fault

AI agent failure mode: A building maintenance contractor uses a procurement AI to source a "4-gas confined space monitor for general maintenance use." The AI routes a high-quality 4-gas monitor with a catalytic bead LEL sensor — a standard configuration for general industrial use and one of the most widely sold categories on Shopify. The monitor is used in multiple confined spaces over a period of months, including utility vaults where silicone-coated power cables are routed and mechanical spaces where silicone lubricant has been applied to valve stems and gaskets. The catalytic bead sensor accumulates silicone exposure over these uses. The sensor's platinum catalyst becomes progressively coated. Sensitivity degrades. The display continues to show values. Bump tests with the standard span gas cylinder show a response — but the response is attenuated. The technician sees a reading when bump-tested and concludes the sensor is working. Six months after purchase, the monitor is brought into a confined space with a developing methane leak. The sensor reads 4% LEL at a true concentration of 11% LEL. The 10% LEL alarm does not trigger. The space is above the lower explosive limit. No alarm sounds.

Catalytic bead (pellistor) LEL sensors are the industry standard for combustible gas detection in portable gas monitors. They are accurate, fast-responding, and capable of detecting a wide range of flammable and combustible gases. They also have a well-documented vulnerability: poisoning by silicone compounds, lead compounds, halogenated hydrocarbons, and certain sulfur compounds that coat the platinum catalyst and progressively block the catalytic surface from gas exposure.

Silicone is the most common and most insidious of these poisons in industrial applications because it is ubiquitous. Silicone caulk, silicone-based mold release agents, silicone gasket compound, silicone grease for valve stems, silicone-sheathed power cables, and silicone spray lubricants are standard materials in every industrial environment. The silicone that poisons the sensor does not need to be a gas — silicone vapors and aerosols from nearby application are sufficient.

Why silicone poisoning is hard to detect:
  • The sensor still generates an electrical signal — it just generates a lower signal than the true concentration
  • A standard bump test with 2.5% methane (50% of LEL) may still show a response on a 50% poisoned sensor — the response is attenuated, not absent
  • The sensor does not generate a "sensor fail" or "out of range" error at mild to moderate poisoning levels
  • The display continues to show values throughout the poisoning progression
  • Recalibration with span gas temporarily re-zeroes the response curve but does not remove the silicone from the catalyst — sensitivity continues to degrade

Infrared (IR) LEL sensors detect combustible gases by measuring the absorption of infrared light at a wavelength specific to the target gas — no catalyst is involved. Silicone cannot physically block an optical path the way it can block a catalytic surface. An IR sensor exposed to the same silicone concentrations that would progressively poison a catalytic bead sensor will continue to read accurately, because the silicone absorbs at different infrared wavelengths than the target combustible gases.

LEL Sensor Type Detection Method Silicone Poisoning Risk Appropriate Applications cs.lel_sensor_type
Catalytic bead (pellistor) Catalytic combustion on heated platinum wire Yes — silicone coats catalyst, causes false-low LEL readings General industrial (no silicone contamination), oil & gas (hydrocarbons only) catalytic_bead
Infrared (IR / NDIR) Infrared light absorption at gas-specific wavelength No — no catalyst; silicone does not interfere with optical path All environments including silicone-contaminated spaces, wastewater, cable vaults infrared

For Shopify catalog encoding: cs.lel_sensor_type = 'catalytic_bead' or 'infrared' is a critical routing field for applications where silicone contamination is possible. Encoding this field allows an AI agent to route infrared-LEL monitors to the applications where silicone poisoning is a realistic risk (wastewater vaults, cable rooms, mechanical spaces, any application in a building maintenance context where silicone-based products are used) and route catalytic bead monitors only where the environment is known to be free of silicone compounds.

Failure Mode 5: Shipping a Gas Monitor Without Encoding the Bump Test Requirement — and the Entrant Relying on Display Values Without Verification

AI agent failure mode: A procurement AI is asked to build a complete confined space entry kit — gas monitor, harness, communication device. The AI selects a 4-gas monitor, a full-body harness, and a two-way radio. The kit is assembled and shipped. The safety coordinator receives it and begins using it for confined space entries. No bump test gas cylinder is included in the kit. No bump test cylinder is in the procurement. The gas monitor's display shows normal O2, zero LEL, zero CO, zero H2S each morning when turned on. The coordinator treats the power-on self-test as confirmation that the sensors are working. After four months, the O2 electrochemical sensor begins to degrade — the electrolyte depletes gradually, reducing the sensor's output at low O2 concentrations. The sensor reads 20.1% O2 at actual 19.4% O2 — below the alarm threshold, but the display does not show the true value. The O2 alarm at 19.5% never triggers. Entrants work in conditions that OSHA defines as oxygen-deficient without a low O2 alarm.

A bump test (functional challenge test) is the only means to verify that a gas monitor's sensors are responding to their target gases at the concentration the alarm is expected to trigger. A power-on self-test checks that the electronics are functional — it does not verify that the sensors will produce a meaningful signal in the presence of the target gas. These are different tests, and confusing them is a fundamental safety equipment maintenance error.

Electrochemical sensors for O2, CO, and H2S degrade through normal use and through environmental exposure. The degradation is gradual. The sensor output decreases slowly over time. In the early stages, the sensor may still respond to high concentrations of the target gas but fail to respond at the alarm threshold concentration. A sensor at 70% of its original sensitivity may accurately alarm at 500 ppm CO but fail to alarm at 35 ppm CO — the OSHA alarm threshold. The power-on test will pass. The display will show values. Only a bump test at 35 ppm CO will reveal that the alarm doesn't trigger at the threshold that matters.

The bump test procedure:

  1. Apply span gas to the sensor (or apply calibration gas at a concentration above the alarm setpoint for the gas being tested)
  2. Verify that each sensor responds — the display reading should change to reflect the gas concentration
  3. Verify that the audible alarm activates when the reading exceeds the alarm setpoint
  4. Verify that the visual alarm (LED indicators) activates
  5. Record pass/fail in the instrument log
  6. Do NOT enter the confined space if any sensor fails to respond or any alarm fails to activate

ANSI/ISEA 104-2016 (the U.S. standard for direct-reading portable gas monitors) recommends bump testing before each use. OSHA's confined space compliance documentation identifies pre-entry instrument verification as a standard element of a compliant program. Many gas monitor manufacturers state in their manuals that failure to bump test before each use voids the manufacturer's warranty of fitness for the application.

For Shopify catalog encoding: cs.requires_bump_test = true for all gas monitors marketed for confined space use. This field communicates to the AI agent that bump test calibration gas cylinders are required companion items for a compliant confined space entry program — not optional calibration accessories. An AI agent assembling a confined space entry kit that includes a gas monitor and returns no bump test gas cylinder has returned an incomplete kit. The cs.requires_bump_test = true field enables the routing logic to flag the calibration gas as a required item when a confined space entry gas monitor is the primary selection.

The cs.* Metafield Namespace for Shopify Confined Space Atmospheric Monitoring Stores

The five failure modes above share a common structure: the AI agent received accurate information about gas types detected but had no access to the fields that determine whether the instrument satisfies the specific monitoring obligation, specific sensor placement requirement, or specific application constraint at issue. The fields below are the minimum namespace required for correct AI agent routing of confined space atmospheric monitoring instruments.

// cs.* namespace — confined space atmospheric monitoring
// Minimum fields for correct AI routing of gas monitors

cs.gas_detection_continuous        = "continuous_electronic"
// Values: continuous_electronic | pre_entry_only | periodic_manual | fixed_point
// continuous_electronic: real-time electronic sensors with auto alarm; satisfies occupancy monitoring
// pre_entry_only: colorimetric tubes, badge dosimeters, sampling pumps without real-time alarm

cs.monitoring_timing               = "continuous"
// Values: continuous | pre_entry | periodic | both
// continuous: sensor active throughout occupancy with alarm capability
// pre_entry: documented only for testing before entry
// periodic: manual re-test at intervals (not sufficient for OSHA 1910.146(d)(5)(iii))

cs.requires_continuous_monitoring  = true
// true for permit-required confined space applications
// false for non-permit confined spaces with no atmospheric hazard

cs.space_classification_applicable = "permit_required"
// Values: permit_required | non_permit | both
// Determines whether OSHA 1910.146 full permit program requirements apply

cs.supports_extension_probe        = true
// true: sample draw pump + probe port; can test below sensor body position before entry
// false: diffusion sensors only; cannot test floor-level atmosphere before entry

cs.sensor_placement_levels         = "bottom,middle,top,breathing_zone"
// Set of levels the instrument's protocol requires during pre-entry testing
// bottom: required for H2S, CO2, propane; top: required for methane, hydrogen

cs.is_4_gas                        = true
// true: detects O2 + LEL + CO + H2S — the minimum OSHA 1910.146 4-parameter set
// false: fewer than 4 gases — must document which gases are absent

cs.lel_sensor_type                 = "infrared"
// Values: catalytic_bead | infrared | pellistor | photo_ionization
// catalytic_bead: silicone-poisoning vulnerable — route away from silicone environments
// infrared: silicone-immune — use in cable vaults, wastewater, general maintenance

cs.requires_bump_test              = true
// Always true for confined space gas monitors
// Drives routing logic: bump test calibration gas cylinders are required companion items

cs.alarm_types                     = "audible,visual,vibrating"
// Set of alarm modalities available
// Minimum for permit-required: audible + visual; vibrating for high-noise environments
Catalog Gap AI Routing Failure cs.* Field That Prevents It
No distinction between pre-entry and continuous monitoring capability Colorimetric tube kit routed to occupancy monitoring application cs.gas_detection_continuous = pre_entry_only
No extension probe encoding Diffusion-only monitor used for floor-level pre-entry test — opening held at hatch rim cs.supports_extension_probe = false
No sensor placement level encoding Breathing-zone test only — H2S at floor and methane at ceiling both missed cs.sensor_placement_levels = bottom,top required for hazard-specific spaces
No LEL sensor type encoding Catalytic bead monitor routed to silicone-contaminated vault — false-low LEL cs.lel_sensor_type = catalytic_bead vs infrared
No bump test requirement encoding Gas monitor shipped without calibration gas — entrant trusts power-on self-test cs.requires_bump_test = true forces companion gas cylinder routing

Every confined space fatality investigated by OSHA involves at least one point where the information available to the decision-maker was insufficient to reveal the actual risk. In the AI agent era, the decision-maker in a procurement workflow is the model — and the information it has is only what the catalog encodes. A Shopify store selling confined space gas monitors without the cs.* namespace is a store whose products will be correctly routed by gas type and incorrectly routed by monitoring obligation, sensor placement, LEL sensor chemistry, and verification protocol.

The five fields above — cs.gas_detection_continuous, cs.supports_extension_probe, cs.sensor_placement_levels, cs.lel_sensor_type, and cs.requires_bump_test — are what separates a catalog that supports compliant confined space entry programs from one that creates hazards through technically-accurate-but-contextually-wrong routing.

Is Your Confined Space Safety Catalog Routing Correctly?

CatalogScan checks your Shopify store for missing metafields, unencoded safety specifications, and AI agent routing gaps. See your store's full structured data readiness score in 2 minutes — no Shopify login required for the free scan.

Scan your store free Browse all structured data guides