Home · Leaderboard · glossier.com vs yearofours.com

glossier.com vs yearofours.com

glossier.com and yearofours.com tie on combined score — the spread is in which individual signals each one wins (2 vs. 2). Scan run 2026-04-22 against 15 signals of public catalog data that AI shoppers read when picking products.

100 / 100
Agent-ready
+ 30/70 ranking spread
vs
100 / 100
Agent-ready
+ 30/70 ranking spread
2 glossier.com wins 2 yearofours.com wins 11 tied across 15 signals
https://catalogscan.com/compare/glossier.com-vs-yearofours.com/ Tweet it

Floor signals (0–100)

These 5 signals decide whether each store is visible at all to AI shoppers. Miss any and you fall out of the candidate set before ranking starts.

Signal glossier.com yearofours.com Winner
Public product feed
/ 25 max
25/25
50 product(s) in public feed
25/25
50 product(s) in public feed
tied
Product JSON-LD on PDP
/ 30 max
30/30
Product JSON-LD present on PDP
30/30
ProductGroup JSON-LD present on PDP
tied
Sitemap
/ 15 max
15/15
valid sitemap.xml
15/15
valid sitemap.xml
tied
Open Graph tags
/ 15 max
15/15
3/3 Open Graph tags on homepage (og:title, og:description, og:image)
15/15
3/3 Open Graph tags on homepage (og:title, og:description, og:image)
tied
Robots not blocking
/ 15 max
15/15
robots.txt does not blanket-block catalog paths
15/15
robots.txt does not blanket-block catalog paths
tied

Floor subtotal: 100 vs. 100

Ranking spread

These signals decide which visible store ranks first when an AI shopper asks for a specific product. Floor gets you in the room; depth decides placement.

Signal glossier.com yearofours.com Winner
GTIN coverage across variants
/ 10 max
0/10
0/95 variants have GTIN/barcode (0%) — commodity queries will skip this store
0/10
0/284 variants have GTIN/barcode (0%) — commodity queries will skip this store
tied
SKU coverage across variants
/ 6 max
3/6
83/95 variants have SKU (87%) — partial; aim ≥90%
6/6
284/284 variants carry a SKU (100%) — agents can disambiguate units
+3 → yearofours.com
Review schema (AggregateRating)
/ 10 max
0/10
no AggregateRating on PDP — review schema missing or stripped by theme
0/10
no AggregateRating on PDP — review schema missing or stripped by theme
tied
Brand entity in JSON-LD
/ 8 max
8/8
Brand entity on PDP (Glossier)
8/8
Brand entity on PDP (Year of Ours)
tied
Offers availability (schema.org URL)
/ 6 max
3/6
availability uses short form ("InStock") — fails strict parsers; use full schema.org URL
0/6
no offers block on Product — agents can't gauge stock
+3 → glossier.com
Canonical URL on PDP
/ 8 max
8/8
canonical points to https://www.glossier.com/en-fi/products/you-soie-travel-spra…
8/8
canonical points to https://yearofours.com/products/the-stadium-sweatpant
tied
Description richness
/ 8 max
0/8
median 0 words (20 sampled) — boilerplate-thin; agents down-rank
4/8
median 65 words (20 sampled) — thin; aim for ≥80 words of unique copy
+4 → yearofours.com
Image alt-text coverage
/ 6 max
0/6
0/710 images have alt text (0%) — agents lose a free ranking signal
0/6
0/244 images have alt text (0%) — agents lose a free ranking signal
tied
Hreflang on PDP
/ 4 max
4/4
85 hreflang locales declared (x-default, en, en-sk, en-tt, …)
0/4
no hreflang — if you ship internationally, geos will collapse on the same canonical
+4 → glossier.com
Structured data validity
/ 4 max
4/4
1/1 JSON-LD blocks parse cleanly — no broken graphs
4/4
4/4 JSON-LD blocks parse cleanly — no broken graphs
tied

Ranking-spread subtotal: 30/70 vs. 30/70

Full scorecards

glossier.com scorecard → yearofours.com scorecard →

Compare your store →