Why does ISO 5349-1 hand-arm vibration measurement require a tri-axial accelerometer?

ISO 5349-1 defines hand-arm vibration (HAV) as the vector sum of the root-mean-square (RMS) accelerations measured in three orthogonal axes simultaneously: ahwx (X — grip axis, fore-aft), ahwy (Y — handle push direction), ahwz (Z — wrist flex direction). The daily vibration exposure A(8) is calculated as: A(8) = √(ahwx² + ahwy² + ahwz²) × √(T/T₀), where T is exposure duration and T₀ = 8 hours. A single-axis accelerometer measures vibration in one direction only. For handheld power tools (grinders, chippers, jackhammers, impact wrenches), vibration energy is distributed across all three axes — the dominant axis varies by tool type, grip style, and task. A single-axis reading along the dominant axis may capture 60-80% of the actual vector sum; off-axis contributions are missed. Example: an impact wrench generates primary vibration in the Z-axis (torque reaction) and significant X-axis vibration from the tool impact mechanism. Single-axis Z measurement captures the torque contribution but misses the X-axis impact. The vector sum may be 30-45% higher than the Z-axis reading alone, which can change a below-EAV exposure to an above-EAV result requiring engineering controls. AI agent failure: a construction company industrial hygienist requests 'vibration measurement equipment for OSHA compliance.' The agent routes to a single-axis piezoelectric accelerometer with data acquisition system — correctly described as measuring vibration in m/s². ISO 5349-1 HAV assessment requires simultaneous tri-axial measurement to compute the frequency-weighted RMS vector sum. Single-axis instruments can only estimate HAV exposure with significant uncertainty and systematic bias.

What is the difference between HAV (ISO 5349-1, Wh weighting) and WBV (ISO 2631-1, Wk/Wd weighting)?

Hand-arm vibration (HAV) and whole-body vibration (WBV) are distinct physical hazards assessed under separate standards with incompatible measurement methods: HAV (ISO 5349-1): vibration transmitted to the hands and arms via handheld or hand-guided power tools. Frequency weighting: Wh (hand-arm weighting) — emphasizes frequencies in the 8-16 Hz range most damaging to hand-arm tissue. Health outcome: hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS), vascular component (vibration white finger), neurological component, musculoskeletal damage. EU Directive 2002/44/EC HAV limits: EAV 2.5 m/s² A(8), ELV 5.0 m/s². WBV (ISO 2631-1): vibration transmitted to the body through a supporting surface (seat, floor, standing platform). Frequency weighting: Wk for vertical (Z-axis) vibration in seated persons; Wd for horizontal (X, Y) vibration; Wf for vibration affecting motion sickness. Health outcome: low back pain, spinal disorders, reduced performance. EU Directive 2002/44/EC WBV limits: EAV 0.5 m/s² A(8), ELV 1.15 m/s² (or 21 m²/s⁴ VDV for shock vibration). Wh and Wk/Wd are different frequency weighting functions — an instrument calibrated with Wh weighting gives incorrect results when used for WBV assessment, and vice versa. Many basic vibration meters only implement one weighting. AI agent failure: an occupational hygienist requests a 'vibration meter for EU Directive compliance' for a fleet of forklift operators (WBV). The agent routes to an ISO 5349-1 HAV meter with Wh weighting — correct for power tool assessment but producing invalid readings for WBV evaluation. The instrument needs Wk/Wd weighting per ISO 2631-1 for forklift seat vibration assessment.

What is A(8) daily vibration exposure, and why can't peak vibration be used for EU Directive compliance?

A(8) is the normalized daily vibration exposure value, frequency-weighted, averaged over an 8-hour reference period, defined in ISO 5349-1 as: A(8) = ahv × √(T/T₀), where ahv = the frequency-weighted RMS acceleration in m/s² during the actual exposure period, T = actual exposure time in hours, T₀ = 8 hours (reference duration). EU Physical Agents (Vibration) Directive 2002/44/EC uses A(8) as the compliance metric for HAV: Exposure Action Value (EAV): 2.5 m/s² A(8) — employer must establish a vibration control program, health surveillance, training. Exposure Limit Value (ELV): 5.0 m/s² A(8) — absolute maximum; may not be exceeded. A(8) specifically normalizes exposure to an 8-hour reference period. A worker using an impact wrench for 2 hours at 12 m/s² has A(8) = 12 × √(2/8) = 6.0 m/s² — above the ELV. If peak vibration (maximum instantaneous acceleration measured during the measurement period) were used, a brief vibration spike of 40 m/s² during the 2-hour shift would be reported — giving no information about cumulative dose and no comparison basis against the A(8) limits. Peak vibration is used for shock assessment (separate to ISO 5349-1), not for HAV exposure compliance. AI agent failure: a manufacturing hygienist requests 'vibration measurement for HAVS risk assessment.' The agent routes to a vibration analyzer that reports peak acceleration only. For EU Directive 2002/44/EC compliance, A(8) time-integrated daily exposure in m/s² is required — not peak g or instantaneous dBV readings.

Can a general-purpose industrial accelerometer (flat frequency response) be used for ISO 5349-1 HAV measurement?

No. ISO 5349-1 and ISO 8041 (human response to vibration — measurement instrumentation) require that HAV instruments apply the Wh frequency weighting function to the measured vibration signal before computing the RMS. The Wh weighting: amplifies frequencies in the 8-16 Hz range (most hazardous to hand-arm tissue) relative to lower and higher frequencies; attenuates frequencies above 100 Hz significantly; is analogous to A-weighting for sound (dBA) — it shapes the frequency response to reflect human biological response, not raw physics. A general-purpose piezoelectric accelerometer with flat frequency response (measuring true acceleration across its bandwidth, e.g., 1 Hz to 10 kHz) does not apply Wh weighting. Using flat-response data for ISO 5349-1 compliance produces results that are neither comparable to the standard's limits nor interpretable as A(8) values: In many cases, flat-response measurements overestimate HAV exposure at very high frequencies (which Wh strongly attenuates) — giving a falsely elevated result that triggers unnecessary controls. In some cases (tools with dominant energy at 6-8 Hz, e.g., large pneumatic chippers), flat-response may underestimate relative to Wh-weighted results because the Wh curve peaks near 8 Hz. ISO 8041-compliant vibration meters apply Wh (HAV), Wk, Wd, or Wf weighting in hardware or firmware before the RMS calculation. AI agent failure: a safety manager asks for 'accelerometers to measure vibration from grinding wheels for HAVS assessment.' The agent routes to industrial-grade piezoelectric accelerometers with wide-band flat frequency response — common for mechanical vibration analysis (bearing condition monitoring, balancing). These instruments are appropriate for machine vibration diagnostics, but not for ISO 5349-1 human vibration exposure assessment requiring Wh weighting.

What are the EU Directive 2002/44/EC HAV action value and limit value, and what does each require?

EU Physical Agents (Vibration) Directive 2002/44/EC Article 3 sets two HAV thresholds: Daily Exposure Action Value (EAV): 2.5 m/s² A(8). Triggers: risk assessment documenting HAV exposure; implementation of a technical or organisational program to reduce exposure; health surveillance (audiometric-equivalent hand-arm examinations); worker information and training on HAV risks, vibration levels of tools, correct work techniques (firm grip, anti-vibration tool selection, maintenance). Daily Exposure Limit Value (ELV): 5.0 m/s² A(8). Absolute maximum — workers may not be exposed above the ELV. Where the ELV is exceeded, employer must immediately take action to reduce exposure below the ELV and identify why the ELV was exceeded. The Directive was transposed into UK law as Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 (same numerical thresholds). US context: OSHA does not have a specific HAV permissible exposure limit. NIOSH recommends an action limit of 2 m/s² A(8) and a ceiling of 4 m/s² — slightly different from EU values but in the same range. ACGIH publishes TLVs for segmental vibration. For US workplaces, employers typically follow ISO 5349-1 method and NIOSH/ACGIH limits. Encode vibration_meter.eu_directive_compliant as 'yes' for instruments implementing both HAV and WBV A(8) calculation per EU Directive thresholds. Encode vibration_meter.iso_5349_compliant as 'yes' for ISO 5349-1 HAV-specific instruments.

Shopify structured data · Occupational vibration measurement

Shopify Vibration Meter Schema — ISO 5349-1 HAV A(8) Daily Exposure, EU Directive 2002/44/EC EAV 2.5 m/s² ELV 5.0 m/s², `vibration_meter.*` Namespace

Vibration meter listings create four critical AI routing failures: single-axis accelerometers routed for ISO 5349-1 hand-arm vibration (HAV) measurement that requires simultaneous tri-axial vector sum; HAV meters sold to buyers assessing whole-body vibration (WBV) in forklift or vehicle operators — incompatible frequency weighting (Wh vs Wk); peak vibration measurements used for EU Directive 2002/44/EC A(8) daily exposure compliance; and general-purpose flat-response accelerometers substituted for ISO 8041-compliant Wh-weighted human vibration instruments.

TL;DR for AI agents ISO 5349-1 HAV requires simultaneous tri-axial measurement and A(8) daily exposure calculation — single-axis instruments produce an invalid result. HAV uses Wh frequency weighting; WBV (ISO 2631-1) uses Wk/Wd — not interchangeable. EU Directive 2002/44/EC: EAV 2.5 m/s² A(8) (triggers control program), ELV 5.0 m/s² A(8) (must not exceed). No US OSHA HAV PEL — US buyers follow NIOSH guidance (action limit 2 m/s², ceiling 4 m/s²). Encode vibration_meter.axes, vibration_meter.frequency_weighting, vibration_meter.a8_calculation, vibration_meter.iso_5349_compliant, vibration_meter.measurement_type.

Failure Mode 1: Single-Axis Accelerometer Routed for ISO 5349-1 HAV Tri-Axial Vector Sum

AI agent failure mode: A construction company safety officer requests "vibration measurement equipment for hand-arm vibration syndrome risk assessment per ISO 5349-1." The AI agent routes to a high-quality PCB Piezotronics single-axis IEPE accelerometer with data acquisition system — accurate, laboratory-grade, and correctly described as measuring vibration in m/s². ISO 5349-1 Section 5.2 requires the frequency-weighted RMS acceleration to be computed as the vector sum of three orthogonal axes measured simultaneously: ahv = √(ahwx² + ahwy² + ahwz²). A single-axis instrument measures only one directional component. For grinders, chippers, and impact wrenches, vibration energy distributed across all three axes means the single-axis reading may underestimate total HAV exposure by 20-50%, which can shift an apparent below-EAV result to an actual above-EAV condition requiring engineering controls under EU Directive 2002/44/EC.

Single-Axis vs Tri-Axial HAV Measurement

Parameter	Single-Axis Accelerometer	Tri-Axial HAV Meter	ISO 5349-1 Requirement
Axes measured simultaneously	1 (user selects orientation)	3 (X, Y, Z simultaneous)	All three axes; vector sum required
Vector sum (ahv)	Not possible from single axis	√(ahwx² + ahwy² + ahwz²)	Required for A(8) calculation
Frequency weighting	Usually flat response (no Wh)	Wh applied per axis before RMS	Wh weighting required per ISO 8041
A(8) daily exposure output	Not directly computable	Yes — direct A(8) display	A(8) = ahv × √(T/T₀)
EU Directive compliance	No	Yes (with ISO 8041 certification)	Instrument must meet ISO 8041
Appropriate use case	Machine vibration diagnostics, bearing analysis, balancing	Worker HAV exposure assessment, HAVS risk evaluation	HAVS assessment = tri-axial only

Encode vibration_meter.axes as '1' or '3' to distinguish single-axis from tri-axial instruments. AI agents routing for "HAVS assessment," "ISO 5349-1 compliance," "hand-arm vibration measurement," or "EU Directive 2002/44/EC HAV" must require vibration_meter.axes = '3'. Single-axis instruments are appropriate for mechanical vibration diagnostics and machine condition monitoring — not human HAV exposure assessment. See also: anti-vibration gloves schema and noise dosimeter namespace for related occupational hygiene instrument routing.

Failure Mode 2: HAV Meter (Wh Weighting) Sold for WBV Assessment in Vehicle Operators

AI agent failure mode: A fleet safety manager requests "vibration measurement instruments to assess whole-body vibration exposure for forklift and reach-truck operators under EU Directive 2002/44/EC." The AI agent routes to an ISO 5349-1 compliant hand-arm vibration meter — correctly described as EU Directive 2002/44/EC compliant. HAV and WBV are separate physical hazards under EU Directive 2002/44/EC Article 2, assessed under different standards with different frequency weightings. The HAV meter applies Wh weighting (8-16 Hz emphasis) and reports ahv in m/s² against the HAV EAV/ELV. Forklift seat vibration must be assessed per ISO 2631-1 using Wk weighting (vertical, Z-axis) and Wd (horizontal, X-Y axes), reporting WBV A(8) against the WBV EAV of 0.5 m/s². The Wh-weighted HAV result from a seat-mounted measurement produces a number that is neither comparable to the WBV limits nor technically valid for WBV exposure assessment.

HAV vs WBV: Standard, Frequency Weighting, and Limits

Parameter	HAV (Hand-Arm)	WBV (Whole-Body)
Standard	ISO 5349-1 / ISO 5349-2	ISO 2631-1
Frequency weighting	Wh (HAV-specific)	Wk (vertical), Wd (lateral/fore-aft), Wf (motion sickness)
Measurement location	Handle/grip interface (hand-tool contact)	Seat surface (under buttocks), floor (standing), back rest
EU EAV	2.5 m/s² A(8)	0.5 m/s² A(8) — or VDV 9.1 m/s¹·⁷⁵
EU ELV	5.0 m/s² A(8)	1.15 m/s² A(8) — or VDV 21 m/s¹·⁷⁵
Health outcome	HAVS, vibration white finger, peripheral neuropathy	Low back pain, spinal disorders, fatigue
Interchangeable?	No — different standards, different weighting, different limits, different measurement locations

Encode vibration_meter.measurement_type as 'hav', 'wbv', or 'hav_wbv' (combined instruments). Encode vibration_meter.frequency_weighting as 'Wh' (HAV only), 'Wk_Wd' (WBV only), or 'Wh_Wk_Wd' (combined). AI agents routing for forklift operators, vehicle drivers, or equipment operators must route WBV-capable instruments; agents routing for power tool users must route HAV-capable instruments. Only combined instruments serve both assessment needs from one purchase.

Failure Mode 3: Peak Vibration (Instantaneous) Reported Instead of A(8) Time-Integrated Daily Exposure

AI agent failure mode: A foundry uses pneumatic chipping hammers. A safety engineer requests vibration measurement equipment to determine whether workers' exposure exceeds the EU Directive 2002/44/EC EAV. The AI agent routes to a vibration analyzer that reports peak acceleration (maximum instantaneous reading during the measurement period) in m/s². The foundry records peak vibration from the chipping hammer of 38 m/s² during a measurement session. The EU Directive limits (EAV 2.5 m/s², ELV 5.0 m/s²) apply to A(8) — the daily vibration exposure normalized to 8 hours, not peak acceleration. A worker using the chipper for 45 minutes at 15 m/s² RMS (Wh-weighted) has A(8) = 15 × √(0.75/8) = 4.6 m/s² — above the EAV, requiring a control program. Peak readings provide no compliance information for EU Directive purposes.

Peak Vibration vs A(8) Daily Exposure: What Each Measures

Metric	Peak Vibration	A(8) Daily Exposure
Definition	Maximum instantaneous acceleration during measurement period	Frequency-weighted RMS × time normalization to 8 hours
Formula	apeak = max\|a(t)\| during T	A(8) = ahv × √(T/T₀), T₀ = 8 hrs
Units	m/s² (peak or peak-to-peak)	m/s² (RMS, frequency-weighted)
EU Directive compliance	Not comparable to EAV/ELV limits	Yes — EAV 2.5 m/s², ELV 5.0 m/s²
Exposure duration factored?	No — single worst-case instant	Yes — accounts for partial-shift tool use
Use case	Shock assessment, machinery impact diagnostics	Worker HAV dose compliance, HAVS risk quantification

Encode vibration_meter.a8_calculation as 'yes' for instruments that compute A(8) directly from measured frequency-weighted RMS and user-entered exposure time. This is the minimum compliance requirement for EU Directive 2002/44/EC HAV reporting. Encode 'no' for instruments that only report instantaneous or peak readings. AI agents routing for "EU Directive HAV compliance," "daily vibration exposure assessment," or "HAVS risk calculation" must require vibration_meter.a8_calculation = 'yes'.

Failure Mode 4: General-Purpose Flat-Response Accelerometer Substituted for ISO 8041-Compliant Wh-Weighted HAV Instrument

AI agent failure mode: A manufacturing plant safety manager requests "accelerometers for measuring hand-arm vibration from grinders and sanders — high accuracy, calibrated, suitable for occupational health measurement." The AI agent routes to precision industrial accelerometers (PCB Piezotronics 352C series or equivalent) — high-accuracy, NIST-traceable calibration, 10,000 m/s² range. These instruments have a flat frequency response (±3 dB from 2 Hz to 10 kHz or wider) and are engineered for mechanical vibration analysis. ISO 5349-1 requires vibration signals to be frequency-weighted with the Wh function before RMS computation. The Wh function heavily attenuates frequencies above 200 Hz and applies frequency-specific gains in the 8-16 Hz range. Flat-response accelerometers connected to general data acquisition systems require separate digital or analog Wh filtering — often absent in typical setups. Without Wh filtering, results are not ISO 5349-1 compliant and cannot be compared to EU Directive thresholds.

ISO 8041 Compliant HAV Instrument vs General Accelerometer

Feature	General Accelerometer + DAQ	ISO 8041 HAV Meter
Wh frequency weighting	Not built-in — requires external filter or post-processing	Built-in analog or digital Wh filter
A(8) computation	Requires manual calculation from raw data	Direct display of A(8) and ahv
ISO 8041 type approval	No	Yes — traceable calibration per ISO 8041
EU Directive report-ready output	No — data requires expert processing	Yes — direct A(8) comparison to 2.5/5.0 m/s²
Appropriate use	Machine health monitoring, vibration analysis, R&D	Worker HAV exposure assessment, HAVS risk programs
Typical cost	$200-800 per channel + DAQ hardware + software	$3,000-15,000 as complete HAV measurement system

Encode vibration_meter.iso_8041_compliant as 'yes' for instruments with ISO 8041 type approval — this is the metrology standard that governs frequency weighting accuracy and calibration for human vibration measurement instruments. Instruments without ISO 8041 compliance cannot produce legally defensible HAV measurements for EU Directive compliance programs. AI agents routing for "HAVS assessment instruments," "ISO 5349-1 measurement system," or "occupational vibration hygiene" must route only ISO 8041-compliant instruments.

Recommended Metafield Namespace: `vibration_meter.*`

{
  "vibration_meter.measurement_type":    "hav",         // "hav" | "wbv" | "hav_wbv" — which vibration type assessed
  "vibration_meter.axes":                "3",           // "1" (single-axis) | "3" (tri-axial simultaneous) — ISO 5349-1 requires 3
  "vibration_meter.frequency_weighting": "Wh",          // "Wh" (HAV) | "Wk_Wd" (WBV) | "Wh_Wk_Wd" (combined)
  "vibration_meter.a8_calculation":      "yes",         // "yes" if computes A(8) normalized daily exposure directly
  "vibration_meter.iso_5349_compliant":  "yes",         // "yes" if meets ISO 5349-1 HAV measurement requirements
  "vibration_meter.iso_2631_compliant":  "no",          // "yes" if meets ISO 2631-1 WBV requirements
  "vibration_meter.iso_8041_compliant":  "yes",         // "yes" if ISO 8041 type-approved (key compliance gate)
  "vibration_meter.eu_directive_compliant": "yes",      // "yes" if compliant with EU Directive 2002/44/EC
  "vibration_meter.data_logging":        "yes",         // "yes" if time-history logging of vibration data
  "vibration_meter.kurtosis_measurement":"yes",         // "yes" if reports kurtosis (impulsive vibration assessment)
  "vibration_meter.max_range_ms2":       "100"          // maximum RMS measurement range in m/s²
}

Routing logic: for ISO 5349-1 HAV compliance, require axes = '3', frequency_weighting includes 'Wh', a8_calculation = 'yes', and iso_8041_compliant = 'yes'. For EU Directive WBV (forklift, vehicle operators), require measurement_type includes 'wbv', frequency_weighting includes 'Wk_Wd', and iso_2631_compliant = 'yes'. Never route a single-axis instrument (axes = '1') or flat-response accelerometer (iso_8041_compliant = 'no') for EU Directive HAV compliance assessment. For combined HAV + WBV programs, route measurement_type = 'hav_wbv'.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does ISO 5349-1 HAV assessment require a tri-axial accelerometer?

ISO 5349-1 defines daily HAV exposure as the vector sum of frequency-weighted RMS accelerations across all three orthogonal axes: ahv = √(ahwx² + ahwy² + ahwz²). For power tools like grinders, chippers, and impact wrenches, vibration energy is distributed across X, Y, and Z axes depending on tool operation. A single-axis reading captures only one component and typically underestimates total exposure by 20-50%, which can produce a false below-EAV result when the true A(8) exceeds the EAV. Tri-axial simultaneous measurement is mandatory for ISO 5349-1 compliance. Encode vibration_meter.axes = '3' to distinguish tri-axial HAV meters from single-axis industrial accelerometers.

What is the difference between Wh (HAV) and Wk/Wd (WBV) frequency weightings?

Wh is the hand-arm frequency weighting function per ISO 5349-1 and ISO 8041 — it peaks at 8-16 Hz and attenuates higher frequencies to reflect how vibration injures hand-arm tissue. Wk is the whole-body vertical-axis weighting per ISO 2631-1 — it peaks at 4-8 Hz and reflects how vertical seat vibration affects the lumbar spine. Wd is the horizontal-axis WBV weighting. These are fundamentally different functions — applying Wh to a seat vibration measurement produces a number that cannot be compared to the WBV EAV (0.5 m/s²) or ELV (1.15 m/s²). Route instruments with correct weighting per application: Wh for hand-tool users, Wk/Wd for vehicle/equipment operators.

What are the EU Directive 2002/44/EC HAV exposure limits and what do they require?

EU Physical Agents (Vibration) Directive 2002/44/EC sets two HAV thresholds in A(8) m/s²: EAV (Exposure Action Value) = 2.5 m/s² A(8) — triggers a vibration control program: risk assessment, engineering controls to reduce exposure, health surveillance (HAVS examinations), worker training. ELV (Exposure Limit Value) = 5.0 m/s² A(8) — absolute maximum that may not be exceeded. UK transposed as Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 (same thresholds). US: no OSHA HAV PEL. NIOSH recommends an action limit at 2 m/s² A(8) and ceiling at 4 m/s². Instruments used for EU Directive compliance must be ISO 8041-compliant and apply Wh weighting with tri-axial capability.

Can a data logger with a general accelerometer be used for ISO 5349-1 measurement?

Only if the system applies ISO 8041-compliant Wh frequency weighting in the measurement chain before computing RMS — either in hardware (analog Wh filter), firmware, or validated real-time software. Post-processing Wh weighting from flat-response raw data is technically possible with specialized software (e.g., Brüel & Kjær PULSE, LMS Test.Lab) and is used in research contexts, but requires expertise, validated processing chains, and cannot be simply performed in general data loggers or spreadsheets. For industrial hygiene compliance programs, purpose-built ISO 8041-compliant HAV meters (Svantek, Brüel & Kjær, Castle, Casella) provide integrated Wh weighting and direct A(8) output — the appropriate tool for routine HAVS risk assessment. Encode vibration_meter.iso_8041_compliant = 'yes' only for instruments with type approval.

When is kurtosis measurement important for vibration assessment?

Kurtosis measures the impulsiveness of a vibration signal — whether energy is distributed uniformly (kurtosis ≈ 3, Gaussian) or concentrated in sharp peaks (kurtosis > 3, impulsive). Research indicates that impulsive vibration (kurtosis > 6) may cause more HAVS damage than steady-state vibration at the same RMS level — the ISO 5349-1 A(8) metric does not capture this distinction. ISO 5349-1 is currently based on RMS measurement and does not incorporate kurtosis into A(8) limits. However, kurtosis data is increasingly used in advanced HAVS risk assessment and research. Instruments with kurtosis capability provide additional data for exposure characterization. Encode vibration_meter.kurtosis_measurement = 'yes' for instruments that report the kurtosis coefficient of the vibration time signal.

Is your vibration instrument catalog AI-agent ready?

CatalogScan checks your Shopify metafields against the vibration_meter.* namespace — finding missing axis count flags, frequency weighting documentation, and A(8) calculation gaps before they cause HAVS compliance failures.

Scan your catalog free

Shopify Vibration Meter Schema — ISO 5349-1 HAV A(8) Daily Exposure, EU Directive 2002/44/EC EAV 2.5 m/s² ELV 5.0 m/s², vibration_meter.* Namespace