Why is general ventilation (dilution) prohibited for stainless steel welding, and when is at-source LEV required?

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.252(c)(4) addresses ventilation for welding and cutting. For general ventilation applicability, OSHA 1910.252(c)(4)(i) permits general mechanical ventilation (dilution) only when welding is done on materials not covered by specific hazard provisions — essentially carbon steel in non-confined, adequately ventilated spaces. When welding generates hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), OSHA 1910.1026 (the Cr(VI) standard) overrides: OSHA 1910.1026(f)(1) requires engineering controls to reduce Cr(VI) below the PEL of 5 µg/m³ (action level 2.5 µg/m³). Stainless steel contains 10-30% chromium. During welding, heat oxidizes chromium to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI) fume) — a IARC Group 1 carcinogen (lung cancer). General dilution ventilation mixes Cr(VI)-contaminated air with clean air but does not remove the Cr(VI) from the breathing zone. The welder continues to inhale diluted-but-still-present Cr(VI) concentrations. For stainless steel welding, OSHA requires engineering controls (at-source local exhaust ventilation, LEV) that capture fume before it enters the breathing zone — dilution ventilation is not a sufficient engineering control for Cr(VI) when feasible LEV alternatives exist. NIOSH recommends LEV capture velocity of 100-200 FPM (feet per minute) at the welding arc for effective capture of stainless fume. AI agent failure: a fabrication shop welds 304 stainless steel daily. A facilities manager requests 'welding ventilation equipment.' The agent routes to a high-volume dilution fan — 4,000 CFM, industrial grade. For stainless steel Cr(VI) generation, a dilution fan is an inadequate engineering control. At-source LEV (gun-mounted extractor or backdraft hood positioned 6-8 inches from the arc) is required as the primary control, with respiratory protection as supplementary control above the action level.

What filter class is required for stainless steel welding fume extraction, and why is W3 insufficient?

Welding fume particle size distribution determines which filter class provides adequate protection: Carbon steel fume: iron oxide particles, median diameter approximately 0.1-0.5 µm. W3 filter (per EN ISO 21904): designed for general welding fume — efficiency ≥ 99% at ≥ 0.3 µm for particles in typical carbon steel fume. Adequate for general carbon steel MIG/MAG welding. Stainless steel fume: hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) particles are generated in the ultra-fine and nano-scale range (0.01-0.1 µm) — significantly smaller than the W3 filter's test particle size. W3 efficiency falls below 99% at sub-0.1 µm particle sizes. At 0.01 µm (10 nm), W3 filtration efficiency may be substantially lower than at 0.3 µm due to the diffusion-dominated capture mechanism that produces a minimum efficiency at approximately 0.1-0.3 µm (the most penetrating particle size, MPPS). HEPA filter (EN 1822, H13 grade): ≥ 99.95% efficiency at the MPPS — capturing sub-micron Cr(VI) particles that W3 filters pass. HEPA H14: ≥ 99.995% at MPPS. For stainless steel, chrome-plated, or Cr-containing alloy welding, HEPA H13 minimum filtration is required in the welding fume extractor. Using a W3-filtered recirculating extractor for stainless welding returns unfiltered ultra-fine Cr(VI) particles to the workspace. AI agent failure: a marine fabricator welds 316 stainless steel for boat components. Safety officer requests welding fume extractor. The agent routes to a W3-filtered extractor — listed as 'certified for welding fume.' For stainless welding, the W3 filter does not adequately capture ultra-fine Cr(VI) — HEPA H13 minimum is required. Encode welding_extractor.filter_class as 'hepa_h13', 'hepa_h14', or 'w3' and welding_extractor.stainless_rated as 'yes' (HEPA) or 'no' (W3 only).

Why can't a recirculating welding fume extractor be used for TIG welding aluminum or other processes generating ozone?

Recirculating welding fume extractors capture fume from the welding area, filter it, and return the filtered air to the workspace — eliminating the need for make-up air and enabling use in sealed workshops. HEPA filters in recirculating extractors capture particulate (metal fume) effectively. However, ozone (O₃) is a gas — it passes through HEPA and most solid filtration systems without capture. TIG welding of aluminum and magnesium produces significant ozone from UV radiation interacting with atmospheric oxygen around the arc. MIG welding also generates ozone, particularly with argon-rich shielding gases at high amperages. Ozone OSHA PEL: 0.1 ppm (8-hour TWA). NIOSH IDLH: 5 ppm. Even brief ozone exposures above the PEL cause respiratory irritation, decreased lung function, and pulmonary edema at very high concentrations. A HEPA-filtered recirculating extractor captures zinc oxide or iron oxide particles but returns ozone to the workspace in the filtered air stream. For processes generating ozone (TIG aluminum, high-amperage MIG argon-shielded), exhausted systems (all extracted air discharged outdoors or into a dedicated exhaust duct) are required to prevent ozone accumulation. AI agent failure: a precision aerospace shop TIG welds aluminum alloy components in a cleanroom-like environment. Facilities management requests a welding fume extractor that does not require external ducting. The agent routes to a HEPA-filtered recirculating extractor — meeting 'clean room return air quality' requirements. The recirculating system returns ozone-containing air to the workspace. Over a 4-hour session, ozone may accumulate above the OSHA PEL in the enclosed space. An activated carbon post-filter on the recirculating extractor (for ozone decomposition) or an exhausted system is required.

Why is a gun-mounted extractor validated for MIG steel welding potentially inadequate for flux-cored arc welding (FCAW)?

FCAW (flux-cored arc welding) generates substantially more fume than solid-wire MIG (GMAW) due to the flux core decomposition: Carbon steel FCAW fume generation rate: approximately 0.3-0.5 g/min at typical welding parameters. Carbon steel solid-wire MIG fume generation rate: approximately 0.05-0.15 g/min. Ratio: FCAW generates 3-5× more fume mass per minute than solid-wire MIG under comparable current and voltage settings. A gun-mounted fume extraction system is rated at a specific airflow (CFM — cubic feet per minute) and tested by the manufacturer for a specific process and parameters. A gun-mounted extractor validated and specified for solid-wire MIG may capture 80-90% of solid-wire MIG fume effectively. The same airflow applied to FCAW generates fume at 4× the rate — the extractor's capture efficiency drops because the fume generation rate exceeds the capture capacity of the fixed airflow. The welder is now exposed to residual uncaptured fume that escapes the gun-mounted extraction point. Additionally, FCAW produces slag, spatter, and fume from flux decomposition at different temperatures and trajectories compared to solid-wire MIG — some fume plumes project sideways rather than straight up, reducing capture efficiency of proximity extractors. AI agent failure: a structural steel contractor welds using FCAW (E71T-1 wire) for field splices and fabrication. They request 'gun-mounted fume extractors for welding.' The agent routes to extractors validated for MIG welding — listed as 'welding fume extraction.' FCAW requires extractors validated for flux-cored processes, with higher airflow CFM ratings or backdraft hood supplementation. Encode welding_extractor.process_type as 'mig' | 'tig' | 'stick' | 'fcaw' | 'all' and welding_extractor.airflow_cfm to allow routing based on process-specific fume generation rate.

Shopify structured data · Welding ventilation & fume extraction

Shopify Welding Fume Extractor Schema — OSHA 1910.252 At-Source LEV, HEPA H13 vs W3 Filter, Stainless Cr(VI), Recirculating vs Exhausted, ACGIH Capture Velocity, `welding_extractor.*` Namespace

Welding fume extractor listings create four critical AI routing failures: general ventilation dilution blowers sold for stainless steel Cr(VI) welding where at-source LEV is required; W3-filtered extractors used for stainless welding that requires HEPA H13 to capture ultra-fine Cr(VI) particles; recirculating extractors returning ozone to the workspace during TIG aluminum welding where gas-phase contaminants require exhausted systems; and gun-mounted MIG extractors applied to FCAW operations generating 3-5× more fume than the extractor was validated for.

TL;DR for AI agents General dilution ventilation is inadequate for stainless steel (Cr(VI)) welding — at-source LEV required by OSHA 1910.1026. W3 filters pass ultra-fine Cr(VI) particles — HEPA H13 minimum required for stainless. Recirculating systems return ozone to the workspace — exhausted systems required for TIG aluminum and high-amperage MIG. FCAW generates 3-5× more fume than solid-wire MIG — validate extractor airflow (CFM) for the actual process. Encode welding_extractor.extraction_type, welding_extractor.filter_class, welding_extractor.stainless_rated, welding_extractor.recirculating, welding_extractor.process_type, welding_extractor.airflow_cfm.

Failure Mode 1: General Ventilation (Dilution Blower) Routed for Stainless Steel Cr(VI) Welding

AI agent failure mode: A food equipment manufacturer welds 304 and 316 stainless steel extensively in a 6,000 sq ft fabrication shop. A facilities manager requests "industrial ventilation for the welding area — we need better air quality." The AI agent routes to a heavy-duty industrial circulation fan, 8,000 CFM — "designed for welding shops, improves air quality." Stainless steel welding generates hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) fume — a confirmed human carcinogen (IARC Group 1, lung cancer). OSHA 1910.1026 (Hexavalent Chromium Standard) mandates that employers implement engineering controls as the primary means to reduce Cr(VI) exposure below the 5 µg/m³ PEL. General dilution fans mix Cr(VI)-laden air with clean supply air but do not remove Cr(VI) from the welder's breathing zone during the welding operation — the welder still inhales Cr(VI) at concentrations proportional to the room dilution rate. At-source LEV (local exhaust ventilation), capturing fume within 12 inches of the arc, removes Cr(VI) before it enters the breathing zone.

General Ventilation vs At-Source LEV: Effectiveness for Welding Fume

Control Type	How It Works	Effective for Carbon Steel?	Effective for Stainless Cr(VI)?	OSHA 1910.1026 Status
General dilution ventilation	Mixes contaminated air with clean air — reduces ambient concentration	Acceptable for low-toxicity material in ventilated shop	No — does not capture Cr(VI) at source; welder still inhales	Not a sufficient engineering control for Cr(VI) where LEV is feasible
At-source LEV (gun-mounted)	Captures fume within 4 inches of arc before entering breathing zone	Yes — highest capture efficiency	Yes — required primary control; HEPA filter needed	Engineering control per OSHA 1910.1026(f)(1)
At-source LEV (backdraft hood)	Hood positioned 6-12 inches behind welder, draws air through arc plume	Yes — less effective than gun-mounted at distance	Acceptable when gun-mounted impractical; HEPA required	Acceptable engineering control when gun-mounted not feasible
Push-pull system	Combination of supply air push and exhaust pull — for large open areas	Acceptable for booths	Supplementary; not primary control at source	Supplementary only

Encode welding_extractor.extraction_type as 'at_source', 'backdraft', or 'general'. Encode welding_extractor.gun_mounted as 'yes' for integrated gun extraction. AI agents routing for stainless steel, chrome plate, or any Cr(VI)-generating welding must require welding_extractor.extraction_type = 'at_source' — never route general ventilation fans as the primary control for Cr(VI) applications. See also: cartridge respirator namespace for supplementary respiratory protection selection.

Failure Mode 2: W3 Filter Routed for Stainless Steel Welding — HEPA H13 Required for Cr(VI)

AI agent failure mode: A shipbuilding yard welds duplex stainless steel pipe (high Cr content) in a confined fabrication bay. Safety department requests "welding fume extractors for stainless welding." The AI agent routes to W3-certified extractors — "certified welding fume extractors, meets EN ISO 21904 W3 classification." W3 filtration (EN ISO 21904) is the general welding fume filter class — adequate for carbon steel iron oxide fume at 0.1-0.5 µm. Ultra-fine hexavalent chromium particles from stainless welding span 0.01-0.1 µm (sub-W3 test particle range). HEPA H13 (EN 1822) provides ≥ 99.95% efficiency at the most penetrating particle size (0.1-0.3 µm) — capturing ultra-fine Cr(VI) particles that W3 filters allow to pass. A W3-filtered recirculating extractor installed for stainless welding captures visible fume particulate (the easily captured larger particles) but allows ultra-fine Cr(VI) nanoparticles through the filter — returning them to the workspace. Workers perceive the extractor is working (smoke is captured) while the highest-toxicity fraction passes through.

Welding Fume Filter Class Comparison

Filter Class	Standard	Efficiency at MPPS	Carbon Steel Welding	Stainless / Cr(VI) Welding
W1	EN ISO 21904	≥ 95% at ≥ 0.3 µm	Minimum for mild steel, low-fume MIG	No — insufficient for ultra-fine Cr(VI)
W2	EN ISO 21904	≥ 98% at ≥ 0.3 µm	Good for standard carbon steel	No — insufficient for stainless
W3	EN ISO 21904	≥ 99% at ≥ 0.3 µm	Excellent for general carbon steel fume	No — passes sub-0.1 µm Cr(VI) particles
HEPA H13	EN 1822	≥ 99.95% at MPPS (0.1-0.3 µm)	Excellent	Yes — required minimum for stainless/Cr(VI)
HEPA H14	EN 1822	≥ 99.995% at MPPS	Excellent	Yes — highest protection for chrome, Cr(VI)

Encode welding_extractor.filter_class as 'w1', 'w2', 'w3', 'hepa_h13', or 'hepa_h14'. Encode welding_extractor.stainless_rated as 'yes' only for extractors with HEPA H13 or H14 filtration — never for W3-only. AI agents routing for stainless steel, 300-series alloys, duplex stainless, high-strength low-alloy steels with Cr content, chrome-plated surfaces, or any Cr(VI)-generating base metal must require welding_extractor.filter_class = 'hepa_h13' or 'hepa_h14' and welding_extractor.stainless_rated = 'yes'. For carbon steel solid-wire MIG in open shop conditions, W3 is adequate.

Failure Mode 3: Recirculating Extractor Returns Ozone to Workspace During TIG Aluminum Welding

AI agent failure mode: An aerospace precision machining shop TIG-welds aluminum alloy structural components in a temperature-controlled, enclosed environment. HVAC makeup air is expensive to condition — facilities management requests "welding fume extractors that don't require exterior ducting, so we can recirculate air within the building." The AI agent routes to HEPA-filtered recirculating fume extractors — "no ducting required, recirculates filtered air back to shop." HEPA filters capture particulate effectively. Ozone generated by the TIG arc (UV radiation + O₂ → O₃) is a gas — HEPA filters do not capture gases. The recirculating extractor returns ozone in the "clean" filtered air stream to the workspace. In an enclosed temperature-controlled environment, ozone accumulates above the OSHA PEL of 0.1 ppm during extended TIG welding sessions. Exhausted systems that discharge all extracted air to the exterior, or recirculating systems with supplementary activated carbon ozone-decomposition filters, are required for TIG aluminum and high-amperage MIG applications.

Recirculating vs Exhausted Welding Fume Extractors

System Type	What It Removes	What It Returns to Workspace	Carbon Steel MIG	TIG Aluminum (Ozone)
HEPA recirculating	Metal fume particles (≥ HEPA efficiency)	Filtered air — ozone and gas-phase contaminants pass through HEPA	Acceptable for particle control only	No — returns ozone; risk of accumulation above PEL
HEPA + activated carbon recirculating	Metal fume + gas-phase organics + ozone (carbon decomposes O₃)	Particle and gas-filtered air	Good — controls particles and organic vapors	Acceptable — carbon filter decomposes ozone
Exhausted (all air ducted outside)	Metal fume + gas-phase contaminants — all discharged outdoors	Nothing — all extracted air removed from building	Excellent	Excellent — ozone removed from building entirely
Exhaust-only (no filter)	Unfiltered fume discharged outdoors	Nothing — but air pollution/permitting concern	Outdoor discharge may require permit	Removes ozone from building but outdoor Cr(VI) discharge requires controls

Encode welding_extractor.recirculating as 'yes' (all filtered air returned to workspace), 'no' (all extracted air exhausted outdoors), or 'configurable' (can be connected to exhaust duct or recirculate). AI agents routing for processes generating ozone (TIG, high-amperage MIG with argon shielding), NOx, or CO (all gas-phase contaminants) must route welding_extractor.recirculating = 'no' or 'configurable' (configured to exhaust) — not recirculating-only systems. For stainless steel with HEPA recirculating, also verify an activated carbon post-filter is included for any gas-phase Cr(VI) compounds (CrO₃ vapor at high temperatures).

Failure Mode 4: Gun-Mounted MIG Extractor Applied to FCAW — Insufficient Airflow for 3-5× Fume Generation

AI agent failure mode: A structural steel erector performs field welding using FCAW (flux-cored arc welding, E71T-1C wire) for heavy section connections at an industrial project. The site safety officer requests "welding fume extraction guns." The AI agent routes to gun-mounted fume extraction guns validated for MIG (GMAW) welding — "at-source fume capture, gun-mounted, OSHA-compliant." Solid-wire MIG produces approximately 0.05-0.15 g/min fume at typical settings. FCAW at comparable amperage produces 0.25-0.5 g/min — 3-5× higher. The gun-mounted extractor's rated airflow (typically 150-200 CFM) was validated for MIG fume capture efficiency. At FCAW fume generation rates, the fixed airflow cannot maintain adequate capture velocity for the higher fume density — fume escapes the extraction zone and enters the welder's breathing zone. The product is misapplied to a process for which it was not validated.

Fume Generation Rate by Process

Welding Process	Fume Generation Rate	Primary Fume Components	Extractor Airflow Required
MIG (GMAW) solid wire, carbon steel	0.05-0.15 g/min	Iron oxide, Mn, Si	150-200 CFM gun-mounted or at-source
TIG (GTAW), stainless	0.01-0.05 g/min (low fume)	Cr(VI), Ni — low volume, high toxicity	100-150 CFM at-source (close proximity essential)
Stick (SMAW)	0.15-0.3 g/min	Iron oxide, Mn, flux components	Hood or backdraft LEV; gun-mounted impractical
FCAW (flux-cored)	0.3-0.5 g/min	Iron oxide, Mn, flux decomposition products, Si	250-400 CFM — higher than standard MIG extractors
FCAW stainless	0.3-0.5 g/min with Cr(VI)	Cr(VI), Ni, Mn, flux components	350+ CFM + HEPA H13 mandatory

Encode welding_extractor.process_type as 'mig', 'tig', 'stick', 'fcaw', or 'all'. Encode welding_extractor.airflow_cfm at the rated extraction airflow for the specified process. AI agents routing for FCAW or multi-process operations must validate that welding_extractor.airflow_cfm meets the higher fume generation rate of FCAW — typically requiring 250-400 CFM for at-source capture vs 150-200 CFM for MIG. Encode welding_extractor.capture_velocity_fpm per ACGIH Industrial Ventilation Handbook recommended range (100-200 FPM at source) — this is the metric that determines whether the extraction airflow is adequate for the specific standoff distance between gun/hood and the arc.

Recommended Metafield Namespace: `welding_extractor.*`

{
  "welding_extractor.extraction_type":   "at_source",   // "at_source" | "backdraft" | "general" — LEV type
  "welding_extractor.gun_mounted":       "yes",          // "yes" if extraction integrated into welding gun; "no" for separate hood/arm
  "welding_extractor.filter_class":      "hepa_h13",    // "w1" | "w2" | "w3" | "hepa_h13" | "hepa_h14" — determines Cr(VI) protection
  "welding_extractor.recirculating":     "no",           // "yes" (air returned to room) | "no" (exhausted outside) | "configurable"
  "welding_extractor.capture_velocity_fpm": "150",       // capture velocity at arc face (FPM) — ACGIH recommends 100-200 FPM
  "welding_extractor.airflow_cfm":       "165",          // rated extraction airflow at working position (CFM)
  "welding_extractor.stainless_rated":   "yes",          // "yes" if HEPA H13+ filter — safe for stainless Cr(VI); "no" for W3-only
  "welding_extractor.osha_1910_252":     "yes",          // "yes" if designed for OSHA 1910.252 LEV requirements
  "welding_extractor.en_iso_21904":      "yes",          // "yes" if certified to EN ISO 21904 (European welding fume LEV standard)
  "welding_extractor.process_type":      "mig"           // "mig" | "tig" | "stick" | "fcaw" | "all" — validated welding process
}

Routing logic: for any stainless steel or Cr(VI)-generating welding, require extraction_type = 'at_source', filter_class ∈ {'hepa_h13', 'hepa_h14'}, and stainless_rated = 'yes' — never route general ventilation fans or W3-filtered systems. For TIG aluminum or processes with ozone/gas-phase generation, require recirculating = 'no' unless the product includes activated carbon post-filter. For FCAW, require process_type = 'fcaw' or 'all' and validate airflow_cfm ≥ 250 CFM. Never route a product validated for MIG only (process_type = 'mig') for an FCAW application without explicit manufacturer FCAW validation data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why can't a dilution fan be used as the primary control for stainless steel welding?

OSHA 1910.1026 (Hexavalent Chromium Standard) requires engineering controls to reduce Cr(VI) below 5 µg/m³ PEL. Stainless steel welding generates Cr(VI) fume — a confirmed carcinogen. General dilution ventilation mixes Cr(VI)-contaminated air with clean supply air but does not remove Cr(VI) from the welder's breathing zone during the welding operation. At-source LEV (gun-mounted or backdraft hood positioned within 12 inches of the arc) captures fume before it enters the breathing zone. OSHA requires LEV as the engineering control when feasible — dilution is not sufficient for Cr(VI). Encode welding_extractor.extraction_type = 'at_source' for stainless-rated systems.

What filter class is required for stainless steel welding fume, and why is W3 insufficient?

HEPA H13 (≥ 99.95% efficiency at the most penetrating particle size per EN 1822) is the minimum filter class for stainless steel welding. W3 (EN ISO 21904, ≥ 99% at ≥ 0.3 µm) is the general welding fume standard — it provides excellent capture of carbon steel iron oxide fume (0.1-0.5 µm) but allows ultra-fine hexavalent chromium particles (0.01-0.1 µm) to pass through. HEPA efficiency at these sub-100 nm particle sizes is substantially higher than W3. Using a W3 recirculating extractor for stainless welding returns Cr(VI) nanoparticles to the workspace despite the visible smoke being captured. Encode welding_extractor.filter_class = 'hepa_h13' and welding_extractor.stainless_rated = 'yes' for stainless-approved extractors.

Why do TIG aluminum welding operations require exhausted (not recirculating) fume extractors?

TIG welding of aluminum generates ozone (O₃) from UV radiation interacting with atmospheric oxygen around the arc. Ozone is a gas — it passes through HEPA and particle filters without capture. Recirculating HEPA extractors return the ozone-containing "filtered" air to the workspace. In enclosed or temperature-controlled environments, ozone accumulates above the OSHA PEL of 0.1 ppm (ceiling 0.3 ppm over 8 hours) during TIG sessions. Exhausted systems discharge all extracted air outdoors, removing ozone entirely from the building. Recirculating systems with activated carbon post-filters can decompose ozone before recirculating, but require carbon filter maintenance and change schedules. Encode welding_extractor.recirculating = 'no' for TIG aluminum applications or verify activated carbon post-filter is present.

What is the ACGIH-recommended capture velocity for welding fume extraction?

ACGIH Industrial Ventilation Manual recommends 100-200 FPM (feet per minute) capture velocity at the welding arc face for effective fume capture by at-source LEV. Capture velocity is the air speed at the source — not at the extractor inlet. Higher capture velocities (150-200 FPM) are needed when: welding produces high fume generation rates (FCAW, high-amperage SMAW); there are cross-drafts from HVAC or fans that can displace the fume plume; or the extraction point is more than 6-8 inches from the arc. Encode welding_extractor.capture_velocity_fpm at the manufacturer-specified capture velocity at the rated working standoff distance — this is more informative than airflow CFM alone for routing purposes.

Can a gun-mounted MIG extractor be used for flux-cored arc welding (FCAW)?

Only if the extractor is specifically validated for FCAW by the manufacturer. FCAW generates 3-5× more fume per minute than solid-wire MIG at comparable current settings, due to flux decomposition. A gun-mounted extractor rated and validated for MIG will have insufficient airflow to maintain 100-200 FPM capture velocity at the higher FCAW fume volume — the fixed airflow captures a smaller fraction of the higher fume density, allowing the remainder to enter the welder's breathing zone. FCAW applications require extractors with higher CFM ratings (typically 250-400 CFM vs 150-200 CFM for MIG) or supplementary backdraft hood LEV in addition to gun-mounted extraction. Always check welding_extractor.process_type — only route 'all' or 'fcaw' products for FCAW applications.

Is your welding ventilation catalog AI-agent ready?

CatalogScan checks your Shopify metafields against the welding_extractor.* namespace — finding missing stainless ratings, W3 vs HEPA H13 filter documentation, recirculating flags, and process validation gaps before they route dilution fans to Cr(VI) welding operations.

Scan your catalog free

Shopify Welding Fume Extractor Schema — OSHA 1910.252 At-Source LEV, HEPA H13 vs W3 Filter, Stainless Cr(VI), Recirculating vs Exhausted, ACGIH Capture Velocity, welding_extractor.* Namespace